OSx less secure
I have said many times in the past that the only reason Macs apppear to be more secure than Windows boxes is the fact that Apple has such a low market share that it simply is not worth a black hat’s time to write malicious code for them. Looks some talking heads agree with me
No tags for this post.Mark Sunner, CTO of MessageLabs, said: “Now, as Macs become more popular, we’re seeing an increase in attacks targeting OS X.” Greg Day, senior antivirus researcher at McAfee, said his company’s recent Global Threat Report found evidence to support that claim.
Day told silicon.com: “Microsoft has the biggest bull’s-eye on it but there’s a lot of interest in Apple right now. There have been more vulnerabilities discovered in OS X than in XP over the past two years.” [emphasis mine]
Day said 95 vulnerabilities have been discovered in XP during that time compared to 238 in OS X.
Jay Heiser, research VP at Gartner, said he would expect to see the risks from owning a Mac increase with popularity and a greater market share. “The relative ’safety’ of the Mac environment is not so much an issue of obscurity, as it is a lack of hack-leverage and perhaps biological diversity,” said Heiser. “From the attacker’s point of view, the bigger the set of logically identical targets, the bigger the payoff in creating ‘crimeware.’
“Clearly, as the number of Macs increase, it becomes more appealing to target them.”
Related posts
Comments
Comment from Doug Alder
Time: 8/2/2006, 12:42 pm
I don’t have a link to it Doug other than that article. The statement came from a senior analyst at Mcafee so maybe it’s on their site somewhere
Comment from TD
Time: 8/7/2006, 4:55 am
*Sigh* Here we go again… Mac vs Windows.
The quote is so out of context and the “because there are more windows than mac computers” thesis is not true either. The windows architecture escalates rights way to easy. It’s insecurity is inherent to it’s system. Almost all of windows vulnerabilities turn into an exploit. Please look at some of these links:
http://daringfireball.net/2006/05/good_journalism
http://comment.zdnet.co.uk/other/0,39020682,39267248,00.htm























Comment from M. Douglas Wray
Time: 8/2/2006, 9:57 am
Can you post a link to that list of 238 vulnerabilities? I’d like know what they are.