Twisted logic
Would someone please explain to me how , like (he ain’t no Democrat that’s for sure) and others, can in one breath, claim waterboarding is not torture, but in the next,
In the worst case scenario — when there is an imminent threat of a nuclear attack on American soil — Lieberman said that the president should be able to certify the use of waterboarding on a detainee suspected of knowing vital details of the plot.
“You want to be able to use emergency tech to try to get the information out of that person,” Lieberman said. Of course, believes such authority has limits. He does not believe the president could authorize having hot coals pressed on someone’s flesh to obtain
Well Joe if it ain’t torture why can’t it be used all the time, why does it need presidential authority. Oh and did you all catch the new catch phrase for torture there “”. Gosh Joe, George (Bush and Orwell) must be proud of you.
The difference, he said, is that waterboarding is mostly psychological and there is no permanent physical damage. “It is not like putting burning coals on people’s bodies. The person is in no real danger. The impact is psychological,” Lieberman said.
Torture is torture Joe is doesn’t fucking matter if it is physical or psychological.
What an utterly being you are. Is it any wonder why when I think of the Republicans I think of Tomás de Torquemada and the Spanish Inquisition.
[tags]scumbag, fucking asshole, piece of shit[/tags]
Related posts
Flip Flop, They’ll be takin’ a bath »
